Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827)
Symphonie n° 9, op. 125 (transcription pour violon et piano de Hans Sitt)

Mauro Loguercio, violon
Emanuela Piemonti, piano

En plus d’être violoniste, compositeur, chef d’orchestre et pédagogue, Hans Sitt était un transcripteur hors pair. Deux symphonies de Haydn, une de Mozart, deux de Schubert, deux de Mendelssohn, une de Schumann et l’intégrale de celles de Beethoven font parties de son catalogue de transcriptions pour violon et piano. C’est une pièce de musique de chambre à l’ingéniosité fascinante qui s’offre à nous conservant la force émotionnelle originelle à travers l’intimité du duo. Cette réinvention de l’espace sonore nous fait apprécier l’œuvre sous un nouvel éclairage. Sa structure s’en trouve éclaircie revenant à l’essentiel telle une épure tout aussi fascinante que la version orchestrale. Les lignes s’entrecroisent, le discours thématique passe de l’un à l’autre avec une habileté remarquable, les tuttis se font explosifs, le jeu sur les nuances est flamboyant, la délicatesse côtoie la puissance. La polyphonie est finement reproduite et le traitement du dernier mouvement pour solistes, chœurs et orchestre est une merveille de savoir-faire, astucieux et envoûtant à l’image du reste de l’œuvre. Au final, on est indubitablement conquis et subjugué par cette transcription. Il est surprenant que cet album en soit le premier enregistrement tant elle doit être stimulante pour les interprètes et captivante pour l’auditeur. (Laurent Mineau)

Hans Sitt (1850–1928) was an extremely important personality in the transition between the 19th and 20th centuries, a great violinist by training and culture straddling Hungary, Bohemia and Germany, but even more of a great teacher who trained many of the great violinists of later years. He was also a remarkably prolific composer. Astonishing in his catalogue, however, is the enormous number (and weight) of his transcriptions of the most important 19th-century symphonic works for the duo of violin and piano. Sitt transcribed all (!) of Beethoven's nine Symphonies, already a cyclopean feat in itself, but also two by Haydn, one by Mozart, Schubert's two best-known (the Unfinished and Ninth), two by Mendelssohn and one by Schumann. This is a labour of unimaginable proportions, if one thinks of the difficulty of distilling for violin and piano these scores of vast proportions, entailing thousands of choices to be made in each bar, and again bar after bar. It is precisely in Sitt’s choice of target ensemble that his transcriptions stand out from those around him, indicating his purpose as distinct from that of his peers. The clear majority of transcriptions of that era were for piano four-hands, because of the impression that dividing the piano between two performers halved the demands on piano technique and that the possibility of register-filling was more apt for the broad spectrum of an orchestra. Sitt’s decision to transcribe, instead, for violin and piano allows him to make the violin a part among parts, to immerse it in the (very rich) piano fabric, sometimes giving it a thematic role and sometimes not, a display of compositional virtuosity which naturally requires the two performers to find the right balance between the sonic weights. It is also astonishing to say, but if one listens to it many times, Sitt's transcription of the Ninth ends up revealing aspects of the original score of which one had never been aware: the polyphonies of the Scherzo emerge with formidable cleanliness, as do the endless imitations and motivic transformations of the first movement. In the Fourth Movement, distillation of the original alternation of vocal, choral and orchestral-only moments to violin and piano alone makes it clear that the variety of character, the shifting from dance to march, from chorales to fugati, from recitatives to arias, is fundamentally a series of variations on the well-known theme, set at the beginning monodically and sotto voce. Sitt's transcription of the Ninth, therefore, in addition to being splendid to listen to, if only in that obvious sense of the formidable challenge it poses to the performers, thus becomes an important and unexpected tool for delving deeper into the structure of the Beethovenian masterpiece. And for this we shall forever have to thank him.